Noah McKay has an interesting apologetic Argument From Beauty here. It’s an abductive argument, meaning it concludes with probability, not certainty. Here is his argument which he defends at length;

1. Human beings are capable of having and do have profound aesthetic experiences in abundance.
2. Naturalism does not adequately explain (1).
3. Theism adequately explains (1).
4. Therefore, all else being equal, theism is more probable than naturalism.

McKay does a credible job of presenting his argument and defending it against objections. It’s worth reading in entirety.

This is the best line from Noah McKay’s brilliant apologetic Argument from Beauty. 🙂 “Aesthetic appreciation and sexual attraction are clearly distinct: I think the Garden of the Gods is very beautiful, but I have never wanted to mate with a sandstone formation (presumably, nobody has).”

Here’s an interview with Noah McKay on his Argument From Beauty